Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168740›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Biophysical Considerations in Cell Fusion.

M Amin Abdolkhani, Alejandro Forigua, Christopher Moraes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Amin AbdolkhaniDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alejandro ForiguaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Christopher MoraesDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada. chris.moraes@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical forces direct cell behaviors such as differentiation, migration, and division. Cell fusion is no exception. In addition to protein-based machinery, mechanical stresses, pressure differentials, and electric fields have been suggested to also regulate fusion. Decades of research have identified numerous fusogenic membrane proteins, yet the precise mechanisms of their action remain unclear. Here, we outline a biophysical framework that links the physics of model membranes to fusion in living cells. We describe how surface free energy, membrane curvature, tension, pressure, and electric fields can play a role in driving fusion, drawing on insights from both model membranes and cellular systems. Finally, we highlight how these biophysical factors contribute to fusion in the context of placental development and how they may inform future work in skeletal muscle, bone tissue, and tumors. By integrating molecular and biophysical perspectives, we provide a starting point to uncover conserved principles of cell fusion and advance a more integrated view of fusion as both a biochemical and biophysical process.

Indexed as

Cell FusionCell MembraneMembrane FusionAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaHumansModels, BiologicalBiophysicsCell fusionCytoskeleton dynamicsLipid membranesMechanobiologyMembrane poresMembrane tensionSyncytiaTrophoblasts

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.