Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169588›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2026

Hybrid I-ResNeT-ViT and Cost-Sensitive InceptionV3 Models for Tumour Severity and Malignancy Classification Using Medical Imaging.

Jagadish N, Ravi Kumar J, Prasad A Y, Basavaraju G N, Ramakanth Kumar P

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jagadish NDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Atria Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), Belagavi, Karnataka, 590018, India.
Ravi Kumar JDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Atria Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), Belagavi, Karnataka, 590018, India.
Prasad A YDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SJB Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), Belagavi, Karnataka, 590018, India.
Basavaraju G NDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, BMS Institute of Technology and Management, Bengaluru, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), Belagavi, Karnataka, 590018, India.
Ramakanth Kumar PDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, R.V. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560059, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly tumour severity and malignancy classification are critical for timely clinical intervention, improving patient outcomes through accurate risk assessment. However, conventional diagnostic methods often struggle to accurately differentiate tumour severity and malignancy at early stages, frequently leading to misdiagnosis or delayed intervention.

objectiveThe aim is to develop a robust deep learning framework for accurate, automated, and interpretable classification of tumour severity and malignancy across multiple medical imaging modalities.

methodsHigh-resolution mammography, MRI, and CT images were collected from publicly available repositories, ensuring representation of diverse tumour types, stages, and malignancy levels. Data pre-processing involved resizing, noise reduction, and Histogram Equalization with Region-Based Segmentation (HE-RBS) to enhance image contrast and isolate regions of interest. Feature extraction utilized a hybrid iResNet with ViT Feature Fusion (iRViT-HFF) to capture both local and global tumour characteristics. Tumour severity and malignancy were classified using an Explainable Cost-Sensitive InceptionV3 (CS-InceptionV3) model to minimize critical misclassifications and provide clinically interpretable outputs.

resultsThe proposed framework achieved 97.6% accuracy, 96.9% sensitivity, 98.3% specificity, and a 97.2% F1-score, significantly outperforming conventional machine learning and other deep learning methods. The model reliably classified early-stage tumours across all imaging modalities and provided interpretable heatmaps to support clinical decision-making.

conclusionThe hybrid deep learning framework accurately and effectively classifies tumour severity and malignancy at early stages, providing a reliable and interpretable tool to support clinical oncology workflows.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMammographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHistogram Equalization with Region-Based SegmentationMalignancyTumour Severity

Identifiers

PMID42169588
PMCPMC13652297

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.