ReviewJournal of Crohn's & colitis2026
Epigenetic biomarkers in inflammatory bowel diseases-computational challenges and opportunities.
Review in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remain a therapeutic challenge due to their heterogeneous nature and the absence of clinically actionable biomarkers to guide precision treatment. While multi-omics studies have advanced our understanding of the disease, meaningful translation into practice has been hindered by lack of validation and a need to move from association to a more generalizable signal. Epigenetics, particularly DNA methylation, offers a promising lens to capture disease-relevant regulatory states that reflect both genetic predisposition and environmental influences. However, the path to clinical adoption has been limited by persistent computational hurdles. Here we synthesize the current landscape of IBD biomarker discovery and highlight the conceptual advantages of epigenetic signatures. We outline the main obstacles that have limited clinical translation to date, including data heterogeneity, batch effects, and the challenge of distinguishing functional "driver" from non-functional "passenger" epigenetic changes. We then discuss how recent advances in computational methodology-spanning data harmonization, integrative modeling, and interpretable machine learning-can help bridge the gap between complex datasets and reliable, deployable biomarkers. Finally, we propose a forward-looking roadmap for study design and validation aimed at moving the field toward routine clinical implementation, thereby realizing the full potential of epigenetics in IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.