ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2026
Increased risk of urolithiasis in patients with primary aldosteronism: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with various metabolic disturbances, including calcium metabolism disorders and acid-base imbalances. Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between PA and urolithiasis; however, previous studies have been limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent findings. This study aims to investigate the association between PA and urinary stone formation using a large-scale real-world dataset. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database, which includes de-identified electronic health records from over 250 million individuals. Patients diagnosed with PA were identified based on ICD-10-CM and ICD-9-CM codes, and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort of PA and non-PA patients with hypertension was created. The primary outcome was the incidence of urolithiasis (kidney and urinary tract stones), identified using ICD-10-CM codes (N20-N23). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on sex, metabolic disorders, and renal function (eGFR ≥ 60 vs. <60 mL/min/1.73 m²).
resultsA total of 10,578 PA patients and 7,897,605 non-PA patients were identified, with 10,577 matched pairs included in the final analysis after 1:1 propensity score matching. PA was associated with a significantly higher risk of urolithiasis compared to non-PA patients at 1-year (HR: 1.524, 95% CI: 1.238-1.877), 3-year (HR: 1.312, 95% CI: 1.120-1.537), 5-year (HR: 1.303, 95% CI: 1.130-1.502), and 7-year (HR: 1.269, 95% CI: 1.107-1.456) follow-ups. Subgroup analyses revealed that the increased risk of urolithiasis persisted across both sexes and was more pronounced in patients without metabolic disorders (HR: 1.826, 95% CI: 1.452-2.295).
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate a significant association between PA and increased urolithiasis risk, independent of sex. These results highlight the clinical importance of urinary stone screening in patients with PA, particularly those with hypertension or unexplained metabolic abnormalities. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and evaluate whether targeted PA treatment could mitigate stone risk in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42171682What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.