ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Scaffold-Lab: Critical evaluation and ranking of protein backbone generation methods in a unified framework.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diffusion-Based Protein Structure Design: Geometric Modelling, Validation Strategies, and Thermodynamic Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in de novo protein design have significantly progressed, particularly in protein backbone generation, which remains a challenging yet valuable task. However, there has been a lack in standardized evaluation framework to accurately assess diverse methods, nor is there a comprehensive analysis of their practical applications. In this study, we proposed Scaffold-Lab, a unified framework for systematic evaluation of protein backbone generation methods, encompassing a wide range of metrics including designability, novelty, diversity, efficiency and structural properties. We thoroughly evaluated seven representative methods, providing a detailed analysis of their performance and utilities. Our findings highlight that generating long proteins for unconditional generation and accurately reconstructing motifs are key bottlenecks for most methods. These results underscore both the strengths and limitations of existing protein backbone generation methods, offering new insights for further development and improvement in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.