Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174175›Full record

ReviewCommunications psychology2026

Interdependence explains how and when crises impact social cohesion.

Jesse Koster, Martin Lang, Paul A M Van Lange

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jesse Koster *Department of Experimental and Social Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0733-1277
Martin LangLEVYNA: Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-1059
Paul A M Van Lange *Department of Experimental and Social Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.a.m.van.lange@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-6984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crises may bring people together or drive them apart. However, it is not clear whether crises undermine or enhance social cohesion or how such effects might develop over time. We compare four types of crises-natural hazards, pandemics, economic downturns, and wars-to explain their effects on social cohesion from an interdependence theoretical perspective. We argue that social cohesion depends on how much people depend on each other and the government, the (un)equality of these dependencies, and whether people's interests conflict or align. Based on our theory-guided review, we conclude that the four crises are likely to differ in how (and when) they might affect social cohesion within societies. These insights may help societies better prepare for future crises by clarifying when they may heighten cohesion or division.

Identifiers

PMID42174175
PMCPMC13197431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.