Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174259›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Impact of home-based port infusion versus hospital-based peripheral infusion on anxiety, quality of life, and emergency visits in gastrointestinal cancer: a prospective observational study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

Ozan Ahmet Cetin, Turan Karaoglu, Ali Alkan, Tugba Yavuzsen, Ozgur Tanriverdi

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ozan Ahmet CetinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Universitesi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Onkoloji Poliklinigi, 48000, Mugla, Turkey.
Turan KaraogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Universitesi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Onkoloji Poliklinigi, 48000, Mugla, Turkey.
Ali AlkanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Universitesi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Onkoloji Poliklinigi, 48000, Mugla, Turkey.
Tugba YavuzsenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozgur TanriverdiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Universitesi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Onkoloji Poliklinigi, 48000, Mugla, Turkey. dr.ozgur.tanriverdi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0598-7284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home-based chemotherapy via port catheters offers logistical and potential psychological benefits but may pose unique challenges for patients undergoing prolonged regimens such as mFOLFOX6. Evidence on the association between home-based infusion and anxiety, quality of life, and healthcare use in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients remains limited. In this prospective study, 190 GI cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant mFOLFOX6 were enrolled between July 2020 and December 2024. Patients chose either home-based port infusion (n = 94) or hospital-based peripheral infusion (n = 96). Anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-1 and STAI-2), and quality of life via EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, after six cycles (~3 months), and after 12 cycles (~6 months). Treatment-related toxicities and emergency visits were recorded. Logistic regression identified factors associated with high anxiety, low quality of life, and emergency visits. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except for younger age in the home-based group, which lost significance after Bonferroni correction. After six cycles, home-based patients showed significantly higher state and trait anxiety than hospital-based patients (p < 0.001), though differences diminished by 12 cycles. Home-based patients also reported worse dyspnea, pain, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting after six cycles, with most symptoms improving later. Emergency visits without organic pathology were more frequent in the home-based group (32% vs. 13%, p = 0.002), although this difference did not remain statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Multivariable analysis identified home-based infusion, living alone, social inactivity, shorter treatment duration, and low quality of life as independent factors associated with high state anxiety. Similar factors were associated with high trait anxiety, low quality of life, and emergency visits. Home-based port infusion for mFOLFOX6 is associated with transient increases in anxiety and impairments in quality of life early in treatment, which diminished by the end of treatment. Psychosocial support and close follow-up may help reduce anxiety and unnecessary emergency visits, particularly for socially isolated patients. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAnxietyGastrointestinal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultAgedEmergency Room VisitsFemaleFluorouracilHumansInfusions, IntravenousLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsProspective StudiesFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsAnxietyChemotherapy, adjuvantGastrointestinal neoplasmsHome care servicesInfusions, intravenousPorts and cathetersQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID42174259
PMCPMC13197445

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.