ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2026
Extracellular Vesicles in Beta-Thalassemia: Phenotype-Specific Profiles and Potential Clinical Associations.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Βeta-thalassemia is one of the most common genetic disorders worldwide, characterized by ineffective erythropoiesis (IE), which leads to a wide spectrum of heterogeneous disease-related complications. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as having important roles in β-thalassemia complications; however, phenotype-specific differences and their relevance to clinical outcomes remain incompletely defined. This review addresses the knowledge gap with regards to the difference in EV profiles between transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) and nontransfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (NTDT), and how these may contribute to distinct disease manifestations. The evidence indicates that EVs derived from platelets, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and endothelial cells are elevated in β-thalassemia, with phenotype-specific patterns. TDT is predominantly characterized by EV profiles associated with transfusion exposure and iron overload, whereas NTDT shows EV alterations linked to IE, chronic hemolysis, and endothelial activation. These processes have been implicated in thrombosis, pulmonary hypertension (PHT), vascular injury, and various organ dysfunctions. These findings are also supported by functional in vitro studies that thalassemic EVs can induce endothelial activation, oxidative stress, and altered cellular proliferation. Moreover, splenectomy emerges as an important modifier of EV profiles, with splenectomized patients consistently demonstrating higher levels of procoagulant EVs, potentially contributing to increased thrombotic risk. However, heterogeneity in study design, transfusion exposure, and therapeutic interventions complicates interpretation. Overall, this review highlights phenotype-specific differences in EVs between TDT and NTDT and summarizes proposed mechanisms linking EVs to clinical complications. For future perspective, well-characterized cohort studies incorporating rigorous EV isolation, quantitative synthesis, and longitudinal design are needed to clarify the clinical utility of EVs in β-thalassemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42174368What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.