Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174610›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

The SUPREME Index for 30-day all-cause readmission: development and internal validation of a machine learning-based risk stratification index in community-dwelling adults.

Yeong Jun Ju, Soon Young Lee

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yeong Jun JuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, 206 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, 16499, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. joomeon@ajou.ac.kr.
Soon Young LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, 206 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, 16499, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. solee@ajou.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2022-NR072242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital readmissions are a key indicator of healthcare quality and have substantial implications for patient outcomes and system-level costs. Identifying individuals at high risk of experiencing 30-day all-cause readmission events is essential for implementing preventive strategies and improving resource allocation. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a simple, interpretable risk stratification index for identifying individuals at elevated risk of experiencing at least one 30-day all-cause readmission event in a community-dwelling general population using machine learning (ML)-based feature selection and logistic regression (LR)-based risk scoring.

methodsWe analyzed data on adults residing in Suwon City from the 2016-2019 South Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort. The outcome was defined at the person level as experiencing at least one all-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge from any hospitalization during the study period. Elastic net (EN) regularization was used to select candidate predictors, and LR was used to derive a point-based scoring index. Model performance was evaluated in an internal validation dataset using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and Brier score.

resultsAmong 3,357 adults, 357 (10.6%) experienced at least one 30-day readmission event during the study period. Four of seven features selected by EN (top-quartile number of hospital admissions, length of stay, total healthcare costs, and any malignancy) were retained to construct the SUwon Population-based Readmission risk Estimation ModEl (SUPREME) Index, with scores ranging from 0 to 14. Internal validation showed good performance (AUC = 0.861; Brier score = 0.067) with adequate calibration. A cutoff score of 8 provided a balanced operating point (sensitivity 0.742; specificity 0.867) for classifying individuals as high risk.

conclusionsThe SUPREME Index, developed using EN and LR, provides a practical and interpretable tool for person-level risk stratification using administrative claims data. Because predictors were derived from routinely available claims and screening data and were not anchored to a single uniform baseline time point, the index should be interpreted as a stratification tool rather than an event-level prediction model anchored to a specific index hospitalization. External validation and evaluation in diverse populations are warranted.

Indexed as

Independent LivingMachine LearningPatient ReadmissionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentAdministrative claimsHospital readmissionLogistic regressionMachine learningRisk stratificationScoring index

Identifiers

PMID42174610
PMCPMC13371195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.