Trial reportBMC medicine2026
Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study.
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community-Based Chronic Disease Care in Rural Lesotho: The ComBaCaL Cohort Study
Community-based, eHealth Supported Type 2 Diabetes Care by Lay Village Health Workers in Rural Lesotho Protocol for a Cluster-randomized Trial Within the ComBaCaL Cohort Study (ComBaCaL T2D TwiC)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study.BMC medicine · 2026 · on this mapTrial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes poses a growing public health burden in low- and middle-income countries, where major gaps in access to chronic care persist. Task-shifting to Community Health Workers (CHWs) and the use of digital clinical decision support systems may bridge these gaps. Randomized trials evaluating CHW-led care models in which CHWs initiate, titrate, and monitor first-line diabetes treatment are lacking.
methodsWe conducted a cluster-randomised trial nested within the ComBaCaL (Community-Based Chronic Care Lesotho) cohort (NCT05596773). The cohort spans 103 rural villages in Lesotho, managed by trained, supervised CHWs. After home-based screening of cohort participants ≥40 years old or with body mass index ≥25 kg/m
resultsFrom 13 May 2023 to 31 January 2024, 5'785 cohort participants were screened, 252 (4·4%) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and 103 (51 control, 52 intervention) included in the primary analysis (73·8% female, mean age 62·3 ± 12·8 years, mean HbA1c 7·2 ± 1·4%). At 12 months, HbA1c was 7·1 ± 1·9% in the control arm and 6·5 ± 1·3% in the intervention arm (adjusted mean difference -0·46%, 95%CI -1·14 to 0·22). Engagement in care was higher in the intervention arm. No relevant difference in safety outcomes was observed.
conclusionsCHW-led, clinical decision support system-assisted management of type 2 diabetes, including first-line drug prescription, may improve engagement in care and glycaemic control in rural low-resource settings. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT05743387.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.