ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2026
Harnessing Patient-Generated Data for Rare Disease Knowledge Enrichment: A Pilot Study.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with rare diseases often endure a 4-5-year diagnostic odyssey. Patient-generated data on social media remains an untapped resource for understanding rare diseases. This study characterizes patient descriptions of rare disease from social media and systematically compares patient-reported symptoms to literature-documented ones. 166 unique rare diseases were identified from 229 patient posts. A hybrid human-AI framework using GPT-4 with full manual verification was used to extract and standardize patient-reported symptoms, which were then compared against symptoms documented in PubMed. The most frequent patient-reported symptoms were motor impairment, ataxia, pain, and fatigue. A low average overlap was observed between patient-reported symptoms and clinical literature. Patient narratives emphasized quality-of-life impacts (e.g., fatigue, anxiety), whereas clinical literature focused on diagnostic markers (e.g., dysarthria, dysphagia). Patient-generated data reveals underreported symptoms that are particularly meaningful to patients and complement clinical findings. Harnessing these real-world insights holds immense potential to shorten the diagnostic odyssey, inform patient-centered care, and guide future research priorities for rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.