ArticleMedicine2026
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of four anti-non-small cell lung cancer drugs using the WHO-VigiAccess database.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is well established, but there are gaps in the safety evidence. This study used real-world data from the World Health Organization-VigiAccess database to evaluate the post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of these 4 drugs. ADRs data for anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib were collected from the VigiAccess database up to April 30, 2025. To identify and analyze potential ADR signals, the study employed the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network methods. A total of 52,978 adverse event reports were collected for 4 medications, comprising 1642 reports for anlotinib, 10,294 for gefitinib, 12,493 for afatinib, and 28,549 for osimertinib. In the system organ class, all these 4 drugs are generally associated with skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and gastrointestinal disorders. However, the focus of these 4 drugs varies. In the preferred term classification for specific symptoms, some adverse reactions have high frequency and strong signal intensity rankings, and others have high frequency but not particularly prominent signal intensity. The adverse reactions of anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib share certain commonalities and characteristics, which are basically consistent with those described in the drug labels. However, there are also some specific ADRs. Clinically, personalized medication can be carried out based on the characteristics of the drugs and the patient's condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.