ArticlePain research & management2026
Pain, Clinical Tests, and Disability in Individuals With Radicular Low Back Pain: A Responsiveness and Correlation Study.
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain, Clinical Tests, and Disability in Individuals With Radicular Low Back Pain: A Responsiveness and Correlation Study.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the responsiveness of pain, clinical tests, and disability in individuals with RLBP.
methodsThirty-two patients with RLBP were assessed for pain intensity (at rest and at worst), clinical tests comprising straight leg raising (SLR) and five-meter walk test (5MWT), and disability was assessed by the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) at baseline, immediately after, 1 week, and 2 weeks after first-session interventions. Change scores and effect size (ES) were calculated.
resultsPain at rest and pain at worst were most responsive with large ES, especially at 2 weeks (ES = 3.6 and 3.6, respectively). SLR and 5MWT were responsive with large ES at 2 weeks (ES = 0.9 and 0.9, respectively). Also, MODI was responsive at 2 weeks (ES = 1.0).
conclusionsThis study indicated that the responsiveness of pain intensity (at rest and at worst), SLR, 5MWT, and MODI in patients with RLBP at 2 weeks after therapeutic interventions was evident.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.