Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42175740›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Prior Expectations Bias Confidence Judgments Through Parietal Alpha-Band Modulation.

Luca Tarasi, Anna Pasini, Domenico Romanazzi, Margherita Covelli, Vincenzo Romei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca TarasiCentro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia "Renzo Canestrari", Campus di Cesena, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-3173
Anna PasiniCentro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia "Renzo Canestrari", Campus di Cesena, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Domenico RomanazziCentro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia "Renzo Canestrari", Campus di Cesena, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2099-203X
Margherita CovelliCentro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia "Renzo Canestrari", Campus di Cesena, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Vincenzo RomeiCentro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia "Renzo Canestrari", Campus di Cesena, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy.

Funding

Fundação Bial 241/24Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-111335 GA-100Ministry of the University and ResearchNational Recovery and Research Plan 2022H4ZRSN-CUP J53D23008040006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans possess the metacognitive ability to estimate the likely accuracy of their own decisions through confidence judgments. Yet, whether prior information shapes confidence and the neural mechanisms mediating such influence, remain to be determined. Here, two complementary studies identify parietal alpha modulation as an oscillatory mechanism linking prior expectations to selective shifts in metacognitive bias. In Study 1, 75 participants performed a visual detection task with symbolic cues signaling target probability. Within the Type II Signal Detection Theory framework, probabilistic cues induce a congruence-dependent metacognitive bias: confidence increases when perceptual responses align with expectations and decreases when they diverge. Importantly, metacognitive sensitivity is unaffected. Critically, electroencephalography shows that cue-induced right-parietal alpha modulation predicts interindividual differences in the magnitude of this bias. In Study 2 (N = 88), right-parietal continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation (cTBS) disrupts cue-induced alpha modulation, relative to sham stimulation. This oscillatory change, in turn, drives the selective reduction in metacognitive bias. Together, these findings demonstrate that parietal alpha modulation causally and selectively shapes metacognitive bias, revealing an oscillatory mechanism for predictive metacognition.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmJudgmentMetacognitionParietal LobeAdultCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleOutcome ExpectationsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultalpha oscillationsconfidencemetacognitive biasprior expectationsTMS

Identifiers

PMID42175740
PMCPMC13336109

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.