ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Prior Expectations Bias Confidence Judgments Through Parietal Alpha-Band Modulation.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Inference Alterations in Psychosis Proneness Show Task-Dependent Signatures.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Building worlds of your own: the functional role of metacognitive bias in metacognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans possess the metacognitive ability to estimate the likely accuracy of their own decisions through confidence judgments. Yet, whether prior information shapes confidence and the neural mechanisms mediating such influence, remain to be determined. Here, two complementary studies identify parietal alpha modulation as an oscillatory mechanism linking prior expectations to selective shifts in metacognitive bias. In Study 1, 75 participants performed a visual detection task with symbolic cues signaling target probability. Within the Type II Signal Detection Theory framework, probabilistic cues induce a congruence-dependent metacognitive bias: confidence increases when perceptual responses align with expectations and decreases when they diverge. Importantly, metacognitive sensitivity is unaffected. Critically, electroencephalography shows that cue-induced right-parietal alpha modulation predicts interindividual differences in the magnitude of this bias. In Study 2 (N = 88), right-parietal continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation (cTBS) disrupts cue-induced alpha modulation, relative to sham stimulation. This oscillatory change, in turn, drives the selective reduction in metacognitive bias. Together, these findings demonstrate that parietal alpha modulation causally and selectively shapes metacognitive bias, revealing an oscillatory mechanism for predictive metacognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.