SynthesisNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Birth outcomes following intrauterine exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) being used for smoking cessation during pregnancy, the relative consequences are still unclear. Here, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed birth outcomes associated with ENDS use.
methodsThis review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. OVID (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO) and PubMed databases were searched from inception until August 2025, for studies comparing outcomes from in utero exclusive ENDS exposure to non-exposed, exclusive nicotine replacement therapy-exposed, or exclusive combustible cigarette (CC)-exposed neonates.
resultsWe included k = 22 studies with k = 10 independent samples. In ENDS-exposed vs non-exposed births, there were significantly greater odds of preterm birth (k = 3; moderate confidence) but not small for gestational age (SGA; k = 3; low confidence); these findings were less robust to sensitivity analysis. Additionally, there was no significant difference in SGA (k = 3; moderate confidence) or preterm birth (k = 3; high confidence) between CC-exposed and ENDS-exposed neonates; these findings were robust to sensitivity analysis. Analysis of continuous outcomes found lower birthweight in ENDS- vs non-exposed neonates (k = 4; moderate confidence) and lower birthweight in CC- vs ENDS-exposed neonates (k = 4; low confidence), and no difference in gestational age in either comparison (low confidence). Narrative synthesis suggests quitting ENDS was associated with better birth outcomes, and associations between ENDS and delayed development of infant motor maturity and reflexes.
conclusionENDS exposure may confer comparable risk as cigarette smoking to preterm birth. Further research is needed given low to moderate confidence in findings and risk of bias conferred by limited classification of exclusive ENDS use. IMPLICATIONS: With respect to adverse birth outcomes, ENDS may constitute a risk compared to no-nicotine exposure, suggesting the importance of investigating vaping cessation interventions, as well as greater research into alternative smoking cessation interventions for people who are pregnant or want to become pregnant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.