Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178385›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning-based prediction of 3-month mortality in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer and bone metastases.

Tian Gao, Li Qian, Cheng Rao, Xinjian Zhou, Yan Shen, Qing Liu, Xueping Xu, Alin Guo, Wei Wang, Jie Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tian Gao *The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Li Qian *The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Cheng Rao *The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xinjian Zhou *The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yan ShenThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qing LiuThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xueping XuThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Alin GuoThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wei WangThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China. wangwei60215_njmu@163.com.
Jie YinThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 298 Puzhu North Road, Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing, 210031, Jiangsu Province, China. njyinjie@soho.com.

Funding

the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University 23YJRC24the Nanjing Medical University NMUB20230039the Scientific Research Project of Nanjing Municipal Health Commission YKK24239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bone metastases face a dire prognosis, creating an urgent need for accurate short-term mortality prediction to guide care. To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting 3-month cancer-specific mortality in patients aged 70 years or older with NSCLC and bone metastases. We analyzed data from 1,773 patients (aged ≥ 70) from the SEER database (2010-2020). The cohort was randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Seven ML algorithms were trained and evaluated using a comprehensive set of performance metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis for clinical utility. The overall 3-month mortality rate was 48.5%. Among the seven models, the logistic regression model demonstrated superior and stable overall performance. It achieved the highest AUC of 0.79 on the validation set and maintained the highest average accuracy (0.78 ± 0.02) across 10-fold cross-validation. Decision curve analysis confirmed its superior net clinical benefit across most threshold probabilities. Key influential predictors identified included the absence of chemotherapy, presence of liver or brain metastases, and a shorter time from diagnosis to treatment initiation. This study developed and validated an interpretable ML-based prediction model that accurately identifies elderly NSCLC patients with bone metastases who are at high risk of early death. The logistic regression model, selected as the optimal tool, can assist clinicians in making individualized decisions, potentially guiding more aggressive supportive care for high-risk patients and definitive treatments for those with a better prognosis. However, this model was developed and internally validated using a single SEER cohort; external validation in independent datasets is required before clinical application.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisSEER ProgramBone neoplasmsMachine learningMortalityNon-small cell lung carcinomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID42178385
PMCPMC13429615

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.