Trial reportJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Household socioeconomic status, dietary diversity, and risk of stunting among South African primary school children.
Trial report in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren in low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by socioeconomic disparities, which might influence access to diverse and nutritious foods, increasing the risk of food insecurity and low dietary quality. Hence, monitoring of these conditions is crucial. This study examined whether children from households with different wealth status vary concerning food insecurity, dietary diversity, consumption of specific food groups, and risk of stunting.
methodsBaseline data were utilized from a multi-country randomized intervention trial. Primary school children (M
resultsOn average, children consumed food items from 5.8±2.0 healthy food groups. One out of 12 children (8.4%) were stunted. Contrast analyses showed that children from low-resourced families were exposed to more food insecurity, consumed fewer different food items, and were more likely to be stunted than children from the highest socioeconomic categories (p < 0.05). The latter were more likely to consume cereals, roots, vitamin A rich vegetables, oil, sweets, and sweet beverages. Although stunting still exists in marginalized areas of South Africa, our findings confirm that children with higher wealth status are less likely to be stunted, but consume more food items from unhealthy food groups.
conclusionOur findings reiterate the need for improving awareness of healthy food consumption in low- resourced areas. Addressing upstream determinants such as food insecurity, poverty, and access to affordable, healthy foods is essential to reduce socioeconomic differentials in food consumption. School-based nutrition programs should be framed as complementary measures within broader government-led actions, including school feeding policies and teacher-focused nutrition education, to improve inadequate dietary quality among school-age children and address socioeconomic inequalities in stunting risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.