ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Psychological Treatment for Pediatric Feeding Disorder (PFD) and Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID).
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Treatment for Pediatric Feeding Disorder (PFD) and Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID).The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo produce a consensus statement on the psychological treatment of feeding/eating aversions seen in pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), diagnoses that share common symptoms and psychological mechanisms but have historically been addressed separately in the literature.
methodTo help bridge the gaps between ARFID and PFD treatment and research, we convened a group of experts to clarify and describe the psychological interventions for treating learned food avoidance. The current manuscript summarizes the conclusions of the meeting.
resultThe primary outcome of the consensus process was a description of a common core approach to psychological intervention across the two fields: Exposure to food and the feeding/eating experience with the goal of increasing the volume and variety of food and fluid consumed. Although our consensus process identified some differences in the mode of delivery and incorporation of specific treatment elements, the consensus panel agreed that these differences are related to three primary factors: the severity of clinical impairment, age and developmental status of the patient, and the specific feeding and eating behaviors targeted, rather than to the ARFID/PFD diagnostic distinction. DISCUSSION: Building on the consensus statement, we discuss other considerations in preparing for and delivering exposure-based treatment, including multidisciplinary assessment, readiness for treatment, and systemic factors that influence access and engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.