Trial reportThe oncologist2026
Add-on parsaclisib for patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: a randomized phase 3 study.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04551053 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the PI3Kδ Inhibitor Parsaclisib Plus Ruxolitinib in Participants With Myelofibrosis Who Have Suboptimal Response to Ruxolitinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the PI3Kδ Inhibitor Parsaclisib Plus Ruxolitinib in Participants With Myelofibrosis Who Have Suboptimal Response to Ruxolitinib
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Megakaryocytes in myelofibrosis: mechanisms of fibrotic niche remodeling and therapeutic implications.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Roginolisib in Combination with JAK Inhibitors in Patients with Myelofibrosis Who are Unresponsive to Approved JAK Inhibitors (Study HEMA-MED) - A Trial in Progress.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRuxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) is indicated for adults with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis; however, a subset of patients may exhibit a suboptimal response due to persistent PI3K/AKT activation. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LIMBER-304 study (NCT04551053) investigated the efficacy and safety of add-on parsaclisib (highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal or declining response to stable ruxolitinib monotherapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsAdults with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who received ruxolitinib with palpable spleen and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) total symptom score (TSS) ≥10 were eligible. Primary end point was proportion of patients achieving ≥25% spleen volume reduction (SVR; baseline to week 24); key secondary end point was proportion of patients with ≥50% MFSAF-TSS reduction (baseline to week 24).
resultsIn total, 90 patients received parsaclisib/ruxolitinib; 87 received placebo/ruxolitinib. At week 24, 16.7% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib achieved ≥25% SVR vs 9.7% for placebo/ruxolitinib; this difference was not statistically significant. By week 24, ≥50% reduction in MFSAF-TSS was observed in 17.1% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 14.1% for placebo/ruxolitinib. Higher rates of infections (including cytomegalovirus) and gastrointestinal disorders were observed with parsaclisib/ruxolitinib. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60.0% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 42.5% with placebo/ruxolitinib. The study was terminated early based on efficacy findings.
conclusionsStudy results suggested adding parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib was unlikely to offer clinically meaningful benefits. Further research is needed on the potential of JAK and PI3K inhibitor-based combination therapy for patients with myelofibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.