Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42180149›Full record

ArticleForestry research2026

Spatiotemporal genomic patterns of

Shan-Shan Wang, Tian-Rui Wang, Ling-Ling Wang, Pei-Han Huang, Si-Di Liang, Si-Si Zheng, Liang-Hai Yang, Yu Li, Hong-Hu Meng, Xin Zhong and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forestry research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Shan-Shan Wang *Key Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Tian-Rui Wang *Key Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Ling-Ling WangKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Pei-Han HuangKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Si-Di LiangKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Si-Si ZhengKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Liang-Hai YangKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Yu LiKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Hong-Hu MengPlant Phylogenetics and Conservation Group, Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China.
Xin ZhongKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Xiao-Chen LiKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Bin-Jie GeKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Zi-Jia LuKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Yi-Xin KangKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Quan YuanKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Dong-Mei JinKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Xin NingKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Gregor KozlowskiKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.
Young-Jong JangDepartment of Biology Education, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea.
Jin XuSchool of Urban Construction and Ecological Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.
Jung-Hyun LeeDepartment of Biology Education, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea.
Yi-Gang SongKey Laboratory of East China Plant Conservation and Utilization, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interplay between historical biogeography and environmental selection shapes the genetic architecture of species; however, their relative contributions in widespread and ecologically important tree species remain poorly understood. In the Sino-Japanese Floristic Region, the East China Sea has alternately acted as a barrier and a corridor during glacial-interglacial cycles, influencing species isolation and contact. However, the extent to which these historical dynamics, along with environmental gradients, have driven adaptive evolution in dominant forest trees remains unresolved. In the present study, we integrated phylogeographic reconstruction and landscape genomics based on whole-genome resequencing data from 171 individuals across 35 populations to investigate the evolutionary history and adaptive mechanisms of

Indexed as

Climate changeEast AsiaEvolutionary trajectoryPopulation structureQuercus gilvaWhole-genome resequencing

Identifiers

PMID42180149
PMCPMC13195491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.