ReviewRSC chemical biology2026
Recent progress in cGAS-STING agonist design and mechanisms of cancer immune modulation.
Review in RSC chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signalling pathway is a crucial modulator of innate immunity and an important target for next-generation cancer immunotherapy. Numerous cGAS-STING agonists have been developed and evaluated for their ability to promote anti-tumour immune responses. Cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) are the most widely employed natural STING agonists; however, poor membrane permeability and enzymatic instability have motivated the development of non-CDN small-molecule agonists, including organic scaffolds and metal-based complexes with improved stability and tunable physicochemical properties. Additionally, nanomaterials that incorporate metal complexes with or without STING agonists have recently emerged as promising platforms for achieving robust therapeutic effects, facilitating targeted delivery, controlled release, and integration with other treatment modalities such as photodynamic therapy. This review offers a comprehensive examination of advancements over the past two years in the design and development of STING modulators, including organic scaffolds, metal-based complexes, and nanomaterials that encapsulate or tether metal-based drugs. It emphasises their chemical structures and the molecular mechanisms that facilitate STING activation and discusses significant challenges while delineating future research and therapeutic development directions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.