ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Factors influencing Chongqing nurses' HPV vaccination: a cross-sectional survey based on the 5C model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the key factors influencing HPV vaccination behavior among nurses in Chongqing, China, based on the 5C psychological antecedents model. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 550 nurses from public hospitals in Chongqing between April 2024 and July 2024 via an online questionnaire. A combination of convenience and snowball sampling was employed. The instrument gathered demographic data, HPV vaccination status, and responses to the 5C scale (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, and Collective Responsibility). Results: The HPV vaccination rate among nurses was 52.7%. Hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR = 0.939, 95% CI: 0.895-0.985), influence from friends and colleagues (OR = 3.821, 95% CI: 2.634-5.542), and constraints (OR = 0.870, 95% CI: 0.811-0.933) were significant predictors of vaccination status. In contrast, confidence, complacency, calculation and collective responsibility were not statistically significant in the final model. Conclusion: The HPV vaccination behavior of nurses in Chongqing is significantly influenced by age, social influence and structural barriers. To improve vaccination coverage, interventions should focus on leveraging peer influence, fostering a supportive vaccination climate, and systematically reducing constraints through convenient access and financial support. These findings contribute to understanding vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers and inform strategies to achieve cervical cancer elimination goals in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.