ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Development and validation of a non-invasive nomogram for predicting bone metastasis in newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone metastasis (BM) is a major factor contributing to reduced quality of life and poor prognosis in breast cancer patients, occurring in approximately 65-75% of advanced cases. Early identification of high-risk individuals for BM at the time of initial breast cancer diagnosis is crucial for improving outcomes. However, current imaging and biopsy methods have limitations including low sensitivity, high cost, and invasiveness. This study aimed to develop a noninvasive nomogram model using routine clinical indicators to predict BM risk in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective single-center case-control study was conducted with 376 patients (134 with BM, 242 without) from January 2010 to January 2024. Data on demographics, laboratory indicators [e.g., alkaline phosphatase (ALP), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), albumin (ALB)], and imaging characteristics (e.g., tumor size) were collected. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=263) and validation cohorts (n=113) in a 7:3 ratio. Independent predictors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram model was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Results: Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors: low ALB [odds ratio (OR) =0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.95], elevated ALP (OR =1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), elevated CA15-3 (OR =1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), and large primary tumor size (OR =1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). The nomogram model showed good performance: Training AUC =0.85, Validation AUC =0.79; calibration curves approximated the ideal line, and DCA demonstrated clinical utility. Conclusions: We successfully developed and validated a nomogram model based on routine indicators (ALB, ALP, CA15-3, tumor size) for noninvasive and accurate prediction of BM risk in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. This model exhibits good predictive performance and clinical utility, providing a practical tool for early screening of high-risk patients and guiding intervention decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.