ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2026
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance imaging for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in detecting rotator cuff tears (RCTs).
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2021 to March 2025 for original studies on adults (≥18 years) with suspected RCTs undergoing both US and MRI. Thirteen studies involving 792 participants met the inclusion criteria.
resultsUS was better than MRI for full-thickness tears, with a sensitivity of 100% (especially for supraspinatus), a specificity of 81-100%, and a kappa of up to 1.0. For partial-thickness tears, the results varied (sensitivity 72-94%, accuracy 76-94%). Non-supraspinatus tendons were less reliable, and the results were affected by the operator's skill, the patient's sex (worse in females), and the side of the body. MRI was better for partial tears, complicated cases, and planning surgery.
conclusionThe findings demonstrate that US can serve as a valuable auxiliary imaging modality for rotator cuff evaluation, particularly excelling in detecting full-thickness tears when MRI is contraindicated, unavailable, or in resource-limited settings. While US shows excellent diagnostic performance for full-thickness supraspinatus tears, MRI remains the primary diagnostic standard in clinical practice for comprehensive rotator cuff assessment, particularly for partial tears, complex pathologies, and detailed pre-operative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.