Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181464›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review of E-Cigarettes, Heated Tobacco Products, and the Challenge of Disentangling Risk.

Elias Nabhan, Alexandrina-Paula Vana, Edouard Naoum Nehme, Rida Khouri, Nabil Poulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elias NabhanCardiology, Centre Hospitalier Josephine Baker, Gonesse, FRA.
Alexandrina-Paula VanaCardiology, Centre Hospitalier Josephine Baker, Gonesse, FRA.
Edouard Naoum NehmeCardiology, Centre Hospitalier Josephine Baker, Gonesse, FRA.
Rida KhouriCardiology, Centre Hospitalier Josephine Baker, Gonesse, FRA.
Nabil PoulosCardiology, Centre Hospitalier Josephine Baker, Gonesse, FRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), encompassing e-cigarettes, pod devices, and heated tobacco products (HTPs), have attained considerable global prevalence in recent years. While the cardiovascular consequences of conventional tobacco smoking are well characterized, the corresponding risks associated with ENDS remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes the available evidence across device categories, drawing upon prospective cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acute physiological effects, and experimental mechanistic research. Current evidence does not allow reliable quantification of cardiovascular risk attributable specifically to ENDS, independent of prior smoking, nor does it support the conclusion that these products are cardiovascularly safe. Dual use is associated with the highest observed risk, though this likely reflects both continued smoking exposure and differences in underlying user characteristics and should not be assumed to confer harm reduction. Direct ENDS versus cigarette comparisons are non-significant and of very low certainty; apparent benefit may reflect smoking cessation rather than a protective effect of ENDS per se. A main evidence gap is the absence of long-duration cohort data among individuals who have never smoked.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseelectronic cigarettesendothelial functionendsheated tobacco productsiqosnicotine

Identifiers

PMID42181464
PMCPMC13191542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.