ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
The movement imperative: reimagining healthcare through the lens of human movement.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern healthcare systems prioritize diagnostic technologies such as blood tests, imaging, and genetic screening, while systematically neglecting the fundamental human capacity for movement. This paradox is especially striking given that movement is the primary evolutionary function of the human body and a powerful predictor and determinant of health outcomes across the lifespan. Growing evidence suggests that limitations in movement capacity initiate a cascade of physiological deterioration that manifests as frailty, cognitive impairment, and premature mortality. Yet despite its centrality to healthy human function and lifespan, movement remains peripheral in clinical practice, often evaluated informally or only after a significant decline has occurred. Here, we argue for a movement-centered healthcare infrastructure that places mobility assessment and intervention at the core of clinical decision-making. We examine the scientific rationale, economic consequences, and broad societal benefits of prioritizing locomotion alongside traditional diagnostics. Ultimately, we propose that movement analysis should be elevated to the level of routine, sophisticated practice-on par with today's laboratory diagnostics-restructuring healthcare around the proactive enhancement and lifelong preservation of human mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.