Evidence mapPaperPMID 42181579Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Efficacy of transumbilical single-port and two-port laparoscopy in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bo Yang, Yi Zhou, Shipeng Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bo YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Shipeng TangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the perioperative efficacy and safety of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery and two-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia, and to provide high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for the selection of clinical surgical methods. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to collect relevant controlled studies published from the establishment of the databases to December 31, 2025. After screening the literature and extracting data according to the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria, the ROB2 tool and ROBINS-I tool were used to evaluate the risk of bias in RCT and non-RCT studies, respectively. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software and R software. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, involving 22,846 children. Meta-analysis showed that the postoperative recurrence rate in the single-port laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the two-port laparoscopic group (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94, Conclusion: Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery has a significant advantage in reducing postoperative recurrence rate in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia. In large sample size studies, its advantage in operation time is more evident, and its safety is comparable to that of two-port laparoscopic surgery. For medical centers with mature single-port operation techniques, single-port laparoscopy can be the preferred surgical method; for complex hernias or when technical conditions are limited, two-port laparoscopy remains a reliable choice.

Indexed as

inguinainguinal herniapediatricsingle-port laparoscopytwo-port laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42181579
PMCPMC13194568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.