ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
When can whole-genome SNP heritability be reliably estimated from summary statistics?
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
LD Score Regression (LDSC) is a prominent method, which estimates whole-genome SNP heritability from summary statistics via the slope of a linear regression of GWAS test statistics corresponding to a trait of interest against LD scores. It was claimed by the LDSC authors that the free intercept in the regression accounts for confounding bias such as population stratification. In this study, we argue that the intercept in LDSC must be fixed to 1 for accurate SNP heritability estimation. We show both theoretically and with simulations that the estimated intercept does not accurately capture population stratification effects, and that it adversely affects the accuracy of the heritability estimate introducing bias and increasing variance. Fixing the intercept to 1 eliminates bias and reduces variance when no population stratification is present. On the other hand, under population stratification, LDSC is biased with both the free and the fixed intercept. Additionally, we show that estimated standard errors in LDSC are underestimated, potentially leading to false-positives in downstream GWAS analyses.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.