Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182533›Full record

ReviewISME communications2026

A microbiologist's field guide to community ecology.

Luca Beldi, Alyssa Henderson, Megan N Y Lee, Julien S Luneau, Florent Mazel, Thomas E Miller, Prajwal Padmanabha, Benjamin Raach, Simon van Vliet, Anna S Weiss and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca BeldiInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, 3001, Switzerland.
Alyssa HendersonDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9438-5420
Megan N Y LeeDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0888-9776
Julien S LuneauDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-3468
Florent MazelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Thomas E MillerDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32304, United States.
Prajwal PadmanabhaDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-5890
Benjamin RaachDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1263-665X
Simon van VlietDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2532-483X
Anna S WeissDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-2411
Oliver J MeacockDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-9855
Margaret A VogelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1847-5170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many microbiological outcomes are shaped by the determinants of community composition, including the factors that allow pathogens to invade healthy microbiota and the processes that maintain the diversity that underpins soil function. Community ecology provides a rich conceptual toolset to investigate patterns of coexistence that can be adapted to explain and manage these outcomes. However, these concepts have complex histories of controversy and debate that must be considered when applying them to the microbial context. Microorganisms also have distinctive characteristics that must be accounted for when studied using ideas that were originally developed to describe macroscopic ecosystems. Here, we provide a concise overview for microbiologists to five key frameworks from community ecology: Niche theory, Trophic levels, Keystone species, Succession, and Metacommunities. We discuss the historical context and controversies surrounding each framework and outline existing and potential applications to microbial systems. This work therefore provides a practical guide for microbiologists who wish to use community ecology to understand and manipulate microbial community composition.

Indexed as

community ecologyecological filterskeystone speciesmetacommunitiesneutral theoryniche theorysuccessiontrophic levels

Identifiers

PMID42182533
PMCPMC13196595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.