ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Heart failure in 2025: new insights, therapies, and clinical directions.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally, affecting between 1% and 3% of the total population. Despite the great efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), patients still face high rates of rehospitalization and mortality. In the past year, emerging research has brought multiple up-to-date insights into HF treatment and substantial new options for clinicians. This review synthesizes landmark research and clinical progress in 2025 concerning epidemiological trends, causes, risk factors and treatments, aiming to update the evolving landscape of HF treatment. Significant progress is noted in pharmacotherapy (e.g., finerenone, tirzepatide) and device-based therapies [e.g., preCARDIA, cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D)]. The completion of large-scale clinical trials, such as the DAPA ACT HF-TIMI 68 trial and the VICTOR trial, has offered solid evidence for the evolution in clinical practice. The emergence of novel devices offers promising alternatives and supplements to conventional therapies as well. Additionally, cutting-edge therapies like stem cell therapy have also revealed promising clinical prospects. Despite continuous therapeutic advances, substantial unmet needs in treatment and management still present a great challenge, necessitating further research to discover novel and better therapeutic strategies. Hence, major large-scale clinical trials initiated in 2025 are synthesized and anticipated as well. In brief, this review provides a timely update to guide clinical practice and future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.