ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Practice of airway clearance in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey of respiratory therapists and physiotherapists in China.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Airway clearance therapy is crucial for managing critically ill patients with impaired secretion clearance. However, clinical practices and preferences among respiratory therapists (RTs) and physiotherapists (PTs) in China are not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the current practices of airway clearance techniques, device utilization, and implementation barriers among respiratory therapists and physiotherapists in intensive care units across China. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from July to August 2023, targeting RTs and PTs across the Chinese mainland. The survey collected demographic information, ACT application patterns, experiences with four specific devices: percussion therapy device, high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO), mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E), and continuous high-frequency oscillation therapy (CHFO), as well as perceived implementation challenges. Inferential nonparametric tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Of 1,204 complete responses, 984 reported clinically performing airway clearance therapy. Most practitioners were employed in tertiary hospitals (90.7%) and general ICU (46.7%). The frequency of different ACT modalities varied; conventional methods such as nebulization, humidification, and suctioning were common, whereas device-based methods showed significant variation. While the details of implementing ACT differed, a general consensus was found. The main barriers to ACT implementation included limited equipment availability, shortage of dedicated personnel, and lack of awareness. Conclusions: ACT is widely used in Chinese ICUs, but practices vary significantly. These findings highlight the urgent need for standardized protocols, dedicated training, and increased investment in ACT devices to support evidence-based practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.