ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Lumbosacral epidural administration of 4% articaine with epinephrine in dromedary camels (
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidural analgesia is commonly performed in camels via the first intercoccygeal space. However, the use of lumbosacral epidural injection has not been previously described in camels, and articaine hydrochloride (HCl) is rarely used in veterinary practice. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of lumbosacral epidural administration of 4% articaine HCl with epinephrine in camels. An anatomical study was performed on six cadaveric trunks of male camels (age 5-10 years) to identify the depth, dorsal, and ventral width of the lumbosacral space. An anesthetic study was performed on six dromedary camels (three males and three females), aged 7-15 years and weighing 382 ± 152.4 kg. A 0.22 mg/kg dose of 4% articaine HCl with epinephrine (0.01 mg/mL) was administered epidurally. Analgesia and degree of ataxia were evaluated using numeric analgesic and ataxia scoring systems. The onset of analgesia and ataxia and the time to unaided standing after recovery were recorded. Cardiorespiratory parameters were also monitored. The spinal cord was located at a depth of 9.72 ± 0.58 cm from the skin. The dorsal length of the lumbosacral space was 9.32 ± 0.62 cm, while the ventral length was 4.33 ± 0.29 cm. Rapid onset of analgesia in the tail was observed at 4.6 ± 0.6 min. Recumbency began at 8.6 ± 2.7 min, and camels regained unaided standing after 228 ± 19 min. Alterations in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were recorded. Lumbosacral epidural administration of 4% articaine HCl with epinephrine in camels provided rapid onset, mild analgesia (median analgesic score 1-2) in the tail, perineal, umbilical, and flank regions; moderate analgesia in the inguinal region (median analgesic score 2-2.5); and moderately deep analgesia in the hind limbs (median analgesic score 2-3). This was accompanied by long-lasting recumbency and minimal clinically relevant cardiorespiratory changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.