ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Applications of artificial intelligence in systemic lupus erythematosus: integrating multi-omics data for precision medicine.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous autoimmune disease in which patients with similar or disparate clinical phenotypes can exhibit distinct molecular drivers. This heterogeneity limits the utility of traditional, largely linear, analytic approaches and contributes to variations in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic outcome. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offers a complementary framework for extracting nonlinear patterns from complex biomedical datasets and for translating high dimensional molecular measurements into actionable clinical signatures. Here, we review how supervised and unsupervised ML methods are being applied to SLE, with a focus on multi-omics integration across genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. In this review, we specifically focus on how these approaches can define molecular endotypes, explaining heterogeneity in disease course and therapeutic response. We summarize evidence that AI-driven endotyping can reproducibly separate patients into molecularly defined subgroups dominated by distinct immune signatures and facilitate biomarker discovery and improved risk modelling. We highlight the limitations of conventional clinical phenotyping and the need for AI-driven biologically grounded patient stratification. Importantly, we frame these advances within a systems biology perspective, in which AI-driven integration of multi-omics and clinical data enables a unified approach to disease diagnosis, molecular stratification, prognosis, and therapeutic response prediction in SLE. Despite these advances, most AI-derived predictors remain research-grade, and require prospective multi-center validation and explicit demonstration of clinical utility before routine deployment. If key barriers to clinical translation can be overcome, AI-based methods hold promise for achieving truly personalized approaches in the management of SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.