ArticleDigital health
Predicting time to clearance of sport-related concussions using machine learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether integrating longitudinal clinical data improves machine learning (ML)-based prediction of time to medical clearance following sport-related concussion (SRC) and to identify clinical features most strongly associated with classification of either 'prolonged' recovery ( Methods: A retrospective cohort of 217 athletes (mean age 26.94 years) from the USF Concussion Center (2021-2025) was analyzed. Six ML classifiers were trained on Visit 1 features ( Results: Prolonged recovery occurred in 81.1% of the cohort. Adding Visit 2 features improved accuracy in 66% of models, with XGBoost achieving the highest accuracy (0.84, +5% gain over Visit 1). Specificity remained low (0.00-0.34) due to class imbalance. VOR Vertical Headache and its change score were the most frequent predictors of prolonged recovery, present in 81% and 100% of models, respectively. Treatment presence between visits emerged as the strongest predictor of normal recovery. Conclusions: Longitudinal clinical data modestly improves ML-based SRC recovery predictions. Vestibulo-oculomotor symptoms - particularly headache provoked during vertical VOR testing - are robust prognostic indicators. These findings support the utility of granular VOMS subscores for early risk stratification and targeted rehabilitation. External validation is required before clinical deployment. Code: https://github.com/MeganTran6023/Sport-Related-Concussions_Machine-Learning. IRB: USF STUDY003514.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.