ArticleResearch square2026
DNA Mechanical Strain Steers Transcription Factor Recognition.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA is not merely a linear code of bases, but a mechanically constrained polymer whose backbone continuity restricts the conformations accessible during protein recognition. Yet, although base-sequence preferences have been extensively mapped across human transcription factor (TF) families, we lack comparable maps of how TFs read backbone continuity and DNA mechanics, leaving these layers of recognition poorly understood. Here we introduce PIC-NIC, a high-throughput platform that uses site-specific backbone nicks to perturb DNA mechanics while preserving base identity and minimizing accompanying chemical changes. Across 15 TFs spanning eight structural families, PIC-NIC reveals a highly position-dependent response to backbone disruption: most positions are permissive, whereas nicking at mechanically sensitive sites can substantially reshape binding. Mechanistic analyses integrating PIC-NIC maps with newly determined TF-DNA structures, structural comparisons, binding kinetics, and molecular simulations show that sensitive positions often coincide with strain-adapted DNA geometries, including Hoogsteen conformations, whose relaxation can enhance binding or rewire sequence specificity. Genomic single-strand breaks and repair maps further suggest that TF retention at nicked DNA may influence local repair-factor accessibility. Together, these findings systematically map DNA backbone mechanics as a position-resolved layer of TF recognition across diverse protein families, showing how this layer can reshape binding specificity and may influence repair-factor accessibility.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.