Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42184338›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2026

Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on the Use of a Wearable Device for Early Detection and Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring of Acute Respiratory Infections in Nursing Homes: Qualitative Study.

Laura C Grootegoed, Margriet C Pol, Cees Mpm Hertogh, Lisa M Kolodziej, Menno D de Jong, Janke Schinkel, Laura W van Buul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura C GrootegoedDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands, 31 20 566 3026.ORCID 0009-0009-4238-4747
Margriet C PolAging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7570-5190
Cees Mpm HertoghAging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3081-1245
Lisa M KolodziejDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands, 31 20 566 3026.ORCID 0000-0003-3254-5593
Menno D de JongDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands, 31 20 566 3026.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-4738
Janke SchinkelDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands, 31 20 566 3026.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-0644
Laura W van BuulAging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-3464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The growing aging population and staff shortages are placing pressure on Dutch nursing homes (NHs). These challenges have led to an increased interest in digital health technologies. Among these are wearable devices that allow for remote continuous monitoring of vital signs. An example is the Healthdot (smartQare), a wearable electronic device that continuously monitors heart rate, respiratory rate, and physical activity. In the context of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in NHs, where initial symptoms can go unnoticed, continuous monitoring may aid in early recognition, timely intervention, and reduce staff workloads. However, little is known about how health care professionals perceive the use of continuous vital signs monitoring devices, such as the Healthdot, for this cause in NHs. Objective: This study aims to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the use of the Healthdot for early detection and monitoring of ARIs in NHs, to inform potential future implementation. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 physicians, nurses, and certified nursing assistants from 4 NHs and 1 acute geriatric community hospital located in a NH. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed to identify themes regarding their perspectives on the use of the Healthdot for monitoring ARIs in this setting. Results: Five main themes were identified that related to the appropriate use of the Healthdot for NH clients and health care professionals: alignment of Healthdot use and NH clients' treatment policies, balancing safety and freedom, impact of the Healthdot on work processes, supporting rather than replacing care, and possible use during pandemics and in the future. Additionally, several preconditions for the use of the Healthdot were identified, including its usability, a support base among care staff, adequate training and guidance, communication with NH clients and their relatives, and a clear policy regarding its use. Conclusions: Given the complexity of care in NHs, where clinical care is typically balanced against quality of life and a homelike environment, physicians generally expressed reserved attitudes toward the Healthdot, highlighting the need to consider multiple factors in its implementation. Care staff were generally positive about the device. Nevertheless, tailored assessment for each individual NH client remains essential, balancing treatment goals, safety, autonomy, and person-centered care. Additionally, clear communication and alignment between health care professionals in this setting are crucial, specifically regarding their expectations of the Healthdot's role in care processes. This study offers practical guidance that may inform future implementation efforts of continuous vital sign monitoring devices in NHs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelRespiratory Tract InfectionsVital SignsWearable Electronic DevicesAdultDigital HealthEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNetherlandsNursing Homesacute respiratory infectionscontinuous vital signs monitoringhealth care professionalsnursing homeswearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID42184338
PMCPMC13200773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.