ArticleNPJ microgravity2026
Comparison of musculoskeletal responses and its variability after long-term spaceflight and prolonged bed rest conditions.
Article in NPJ microgravity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite near-daily exercise, musculoskeletal deterioration occurs following spaceflight, with considerable individual variability. This study quantifies the extent, variability, and recovery of musculoskeletal deterioration after 6-month spaceflight (n = 13; all male; age: 34-56 years) and compares these findings to those observed during 2-month bed rest without any countermeasure (n = 11; all male; age: 22-39 years). Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scans at 4%, 38%, 66%, and 98% of the relative length of the tibia bone from distal to proximal assessed volumetric bone mineral content (vBMC; all measurement sites) and muscle cross-sectional area (Ar.M; 38% and 66%). After spaceflight, Ar.M decreased by 13.3% (SD 5.0%) at the 38% tibial site and by 12.5% (SD 4.9%) at the 66% tibial site, but fully recovered after three months. Bone loss was observed at all measurement sites (p < 0.05) and persisted through 3 months (p ≤ 0.02). The muscle loss observed post-flight was approximately doubled compared to that was observed 2 months of bed rest, while bone loss was comparable. In conclusion, most comparisons showed no inhomogeneity in variance, indicating that the variability in musculoskeletal outcomes after spaceflight is well represented by bed rest. In summary, bed rest serves as a valuable analog for understanding the mechanisms promoting muscle and bone deterioration during spaceflight.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.