Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42185723›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026

Overdiagnosis in renal cancer: the hidden consequence of modern imaging.

Katherine Vallecilla Valencia, Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine Vallecilla ValenciaUROGIV Research Group, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Herney Andres Garcia-PerdomoUROGIV Research Group, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. herney.garcia@correounivalle.edu.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global burden of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has risen substantially over the past three decades, while mortality rates have remained largely stable. This epidemiologic paradox suggests that a significant proportion of detected renal tumors may reflect overdiagnosis. This review synthesizes current evidence on the magnitude, drivers, and implications of overdiagnosis in RCC, integrating epidemiologic trends, tumor biology, imaging practices, and translational advances. The widespread use of cross-sectional imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has markedly increased the incidental detection of RCCs, with more than 50% now diagnosed incidentally. Many of these small renal masses (SRMs) are benign or biologically indolent. While early detection may benefit patients with aggressive disease, it can also lead to overtreatment, psychological burden, and increased healthcare costs. Emerging strategies, such as active surveillance, radiomics, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk stratification, offer potential pathways to reduce harm. Addressing overdiagnosis is essential to advancing a more precise and clinically meaningful approach to RCC detection and management.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceArtificial intelligenceEpidemiologyImagingIncidentalomaOverdiagnosisRadiomicsRenal cell carcinomaSmall renal mass

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.