ArticleRenal failure2026
Development and validation of an early prediction model for bee-sting-induced acute kidney injury using machine learning.
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe and frequent complication following bee stings, with a reported incidence of 30-50%. Early identification is clinically challenging due to the delayed rise in serum creatinine. This retrospective study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for the early prediction of AKI in bee-sting patients. We included 305 patients admitted between January 2018 and September 2025, of whom 99 (32.5%) developed AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was employed for feature selection from 33 baseline variables, identifying eight key predictors, including lactate, creatinine, and dark urine. Six machine learning algorithms - logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, neural network, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine - were developed and evaluated. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.964 and an accuracy of 92.6% on the test set. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis was applied to interpret the optimal model, highlighting creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, lactate, and dark urine as the most influential predictors. A clinically applicable nomogram was constructed and showed good calibration and utility. In conclusion, this study successfully developed a high-performance and interpretable XGBoost model for early prediction of bee-sting-induced AKI. The validated nomogram provides an accessible bedside decision-support tool to facilitate timely risk stratification and intervention, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.