ArticleBMC cancer2026
Whole genome sequencing in oesophageal adenocarcinoma unmasks potential precision therapies.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) incidence continues to rise in developed countries. Despite advances in deciphering cancer genomes and oncogenic pathways, precision therapies for OAC remain limited. An expansion of precision therapy repertoire in OAC is urgently required.
methodsWe assembled 109 actionable and/or potentially actionable genes based on pan-cancer drug information from open-source compendia and clinical trials. To discover approved treatments and potentially targetable alterations (PTAs), we re-analysed whole genome sequencing data of 217 OAC patients and clinically evaluated somatic mutations in these genes using international cancer curation guidelines. Additionally, matching RNA-seq from 210 of the patients was interrogated for select immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) targets (n = 59), with expression findings validated in an independent OAC cohort (n = 114).
resultsApproved actionable targets were revealed in 23% of patients; including HER-2 and MET antagonists, and immunotherapy directed by microsatellite instability and high tumour mutation burden. PTAs were noted in a further 72.4% of patients, although the highest frequency was in TP53 which is a challenging target for treatment. Other PTAs were noted in APC, ARID1A, BRCA1, BRCA2, CCNE1, CDKN2A, EGFR, KRAS, MDM2, PIK3CA, PTEN, SMARCB1 and TSC2. Candidate co-occurring alterations included co-occurrence of PTEN loss and ERBB2 amplification and co-occurring variants in KRAS and TP53. For the remaining 4.6% of patients, no PTAs were detected. We identified and validated high expression of four genes encoding candidate ICI targets for OAC: CD24, VEGFA, PVR, and SLC3A2.
conclusionThese PTAs and ICI targets will help to inform future clinical trials to facilitate precision therapy for patients with OAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.