ReviewNursing open2026
Best Evidence Summary for Volume Management of Patients With Heart and Kidney Comorbidity.
Review in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo summarise the best evidence of volume management of patients with coexisting cardiac and renal disorders.
designAn evidence summary, a form of rapid review.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in guideline websites, professional association websites and six databases included Web of Science, Embase, CIHAHL, PubMed, CNKI, SinoMed from their inception to 1 April 2024 on volume management for patients with heart and kidney comorbidity. We used the standard that the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing set based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) methods of generating an evidence summary, which includes problem establishment, literature retrieval, literature screening, literature evaluation, evidence summary and grading and the formation of practice suggestions. Two researchers independently carried out the screening, quality appraisal, classification and extraction of the included literature and evidence.
resultsThis study selected 36 articles, including two systematic reviews, six randomised controlled trials, four quasi-experimental studies, six cohort studies, four cross-sectional studies, six expert consensus documents and eight guidelines. A total of 37 evidence items were summarised, covering assessment of volume management, strategies of volume management, education, selection of dialysis modality, patients' preferences and cooperation between multidisciplinary teams and patients.
conclusionCultural and regional differences should be considered in volume management of patients with heart and kidney comorbidity. Future research should focus on investigating the impact of various volume management strategies-including dialysis-related education for healthcare providers, dialysis modalities, initiation timing, dialysis dose, treatment duration, patient-reported outcomes and interdisciplinary collaboration-on volume-related indicators and symptoms of volume overload in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.