ArticlePhysiological research2026
Challenges and Solutions in Low-Biomass Respiratory Microbiome Profiling: A Workflow for Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sequencing in Guinea Pigs.
Article in Physiological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate profiling of the respiratory microbiome in low-biomass samples remains technically challenging due to host DNA contamination and limited microbial yield. This study aimed to optimize a methodological workflow for 16S rRNA sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) obtained from guinea pig models with differing microbial statuses-specific pathogen-free (SPF) and conventionally bred (CON) animals. Using a comparative approach, we evaluated six commercial DNA extraction kits and tested different input DNA concentrations (1 ng vs. 0.5 ng) to enhance microbial detection while minimizing host DNA interference. Among the tested kits, only the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Microprep Kit yielded sufficient microbial DNA for downstream analysis. Real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR confirmed the microbial origin of the extracted DNA. Sequencing libraries were prepared from the V1-V3 regions of 16S rRNA genes and sequenced using the Illumina iSeq 100 platform. Taxonomic assignment and diversity metrics were analyzed using the MicrobAT pipeline. Our findings revealed significant differences in microbial composition between SPF and CON animals, notably in Mycoplasma abundance, which dominated the microbiota in CON but was nearly absent in SPF animals. Alpha and beta diversity metrics showed consistent stratification by animal group and input DNA concentration. However, a high proportion of unclassified reads-particularly in SPF samples-correlated strongly with sequences mapping to the Cavia porcellus genome, indicating substantial host DNA contamination. This study demonstrates the feasibility of microbiome profiling from low-biomass BALF samples in guinea pigs while highlighting the limitations of current sequencing and bioinformatic tools in distinguishing microbial from host-derived DNA. Our optimized workflow supports future respiratory microbiome studies in animal models and provides a foundation for improving host DNA depletion and reference databases tailored to non-human species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42187510PMC13225453What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.