Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42187848›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Mycogenic Nanomaterials: What Fungal Nanoparticles Promise and What Still Holds Them Back.

Kasun M Thambugala, Sanduni Dabare, Asanthi Dhanusha, Imalka Munaweera, Dinushani A Daranagama, Sukanya Haituk, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kasun M ThambugalaGenetics and Molecular Biology Unit, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda 10250, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-0504
Sanduni DabareDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, Nugegoda 10250, Sri Lanka.
Asanthi DhanushaGenetics and Molecular Biology Unit, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda 10250, Sri Lanka.
Imalka MunaweeraDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, Nugegoda 10250, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-0665-1563
Dinushani A DaranagamaDepartment of Plant and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya 11300, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-5704-8943
Sukanya HaitukDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9982-5202
Ratchadawan CheewangkoonDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-3696

Funding

Chiang Mai University FF2568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycogenic nanomaterials, nanoparticles (NPs) biosynthesized through fungal enzymatic and metabolic activity, have emerged as a compelling alternative to chemically synthesized nanomaterials, offering fundamental biocompatibility, green production conditions, and biologically functional surface coatings. Fungi, acting as natural "nanofactories," harness reductases, oxidoreductases, secreted proteins, and secondary metabolites to reduce metal ions into stable NPs under ambient conditions, simultaneously capping the particles with biomolecules that enhance colloidal stability, biocompatibility, and secondary biological activity. Unlike previous reviews that have addressed either biosynthesis mechanisms or applications in isolation, this review uniquely adopts a structured "Promise vs. Barrier" framework across six interconnected thematic pillars, offering the first comprehensive critical synthesis that simultaneously maps mechanistic frontiers, biodiversity gaps, and translational barriers within mycogenic nanotechnology. The present review critically examines both the extraordinary promise and the persistent barriers facing mycogenic nanotechnology across biosynthetic mechanisms, fungal biodiversity, nanomaterial portfolio expansion, biomedical applications, environmental and agricultural utility, and industrial scalability. We highlight how emerging multiomics approaches, integrating transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, are beginning to decode the molecular blueprints of fungal NP synthesis, while acknowledging that mechanistic knowledge gaps, limited genetic toolkits for non-model fungi, and the absence of standardized protocols continue to impede progress. The fungal kingdom represents a vast, underexplored reservoir of nanofactory potential, with fewer than 1% of known species evaluated to date; strategic bioprospecting using genome mining and machine learning is beginning to unlock this diversity. Mycogenic NPs demonstrate broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens, selective anticancer activity, biosensing capacity, and applications in wound healing, sustainable agriculture, environmental remediation, and smart food packaging. However, critical deficits persist in clinical validation, long-term toxicity data, manufacturing reproducibility, and regulatory clarity. The review concludes with a tiered roadmap, spanning immediate mechanistic priorities through to long-term synthetic biology and AI-integrated commercialization, and calls for coordinated international action on standardization, reference material development, and harmonized regulatory frameworks to bridge the gap between laboratory promise and real-world application.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybioprospectingfungal biosynthesisgreen nanotechnologyregulatory standardization

Identifiers

PMID42187848
PMCPMC13209131

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.