ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
Describing Pre-Post Changes Observed During the Implementation of a Snoezelen Program in a Real-School Context.
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory alterations affect 90% of individuals with autism and have been recognized in the DSM-5 as a diagnostic criterion. These alterations often exacerbate emotional stress and may increase levels of anxiety, impacting everyday life activities. The general objective of this work is to assess the changes before and after a multisensory stimulation program aimed at improving sensory processing, repetitive behaviors, and adaptation to the environment in a sample of students with ASD. Twenty-seven schoolchildren participated (M = 10.04, SD = 4.24), with different levels of impairment, diagnosed by specialized teams. The design included a pretest and post-test condition. The results highlight significant improvements in the assessed areas. The Sensory Profile-2, the Bodfish Repetitive Behavior Scale, and the Vineland Scale were administered. The results suggest that changes may be conditioned by the student profile. The profiles that benefited the most in terms of sensory profile and repetitive behaviors were students with levels 1 and 3; meanwhile, students with level 2 did not show improvements in these areas but did show gains in overall adaptation, as measured by the Vineland Scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.