Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188231›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

N-Unet: An Efficient Multi-Task Model for Precise Classification and Segmentation of Breast Ultrasound Images.

Yafeng Yang, Zhengwei Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yafeng YangMicroelectronics and Control Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213011, China.
Zhengwei ZhuMicroelectronics and Control Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213011, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has substantially advanced the automated classification and segmentation of breast ultrasound images. However, many existing methods do not fully exploit task correlations, which weakens information exchange and limits the delineation of fine structures. In addition, commonly used loss functions often fail to balance classification and segmentation objectives effectively. To address these issues, we propose N-Unet, a multi-task learning framework that combines adaptive optimization with feature-enhancement modules. Specifically, the Adaptive Multi-Task Loss (AMTL) dynamically balances the two task objectives to promote stable joint learning. The Adaptive Feature Fusion (AFF) and Cross-Level Attention Enhancement (CLAE) modules improve feature representation through multi-scale integration and semantic refinement. The Conditional Segmentation Boosting (CSB) module further refines segmentation outputs according to the classification result, improving inference-stage consistency. Together, these components form a unified multi-task framework with a shared encoder, a segmentation branch, and an integrated classification branch whose output further supports segmentation-consistency refinement. Experiments on the BUSI and BUS-UCLM datasets demonstrate the superiority of N-Unet. The model achieves classification accuracies of 96.54% on BUSI and 95.83% on BUS-UCLM, with corresponding Dice scores of 80.70% and 92.16%. It reaches this performance with only 8.95 M parameters and 14.74 GFLOPs, showing a favorable performance-efficiency trade-off. These results confirm the effectiveness of N-Unet and its robustness across the two BUS datasets studied here, supporting its potential for practical breast nodule assessment, while broader external generalization remains to be validated.

Indexed as

breast ultrasound diagnosisdeep learningimage segmentationmedical image analysismulti-task learning

Identifiers

PMID42188231
PMCPMC13207542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.