Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188619›Full record

ArticleToxins2026

Subcutaneous Incobotulinumtoxin-A for Refractory Central Post-Stroke Neuropathic Pain: A Report of Two Cases.

Stefano Carda, Elisa Grana

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefano CardaService of Neurorehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7849-1290
Elisa GranaService of Neurorehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7038-7488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-stroke neuropathic pain, particularly central post-stroke pain and facial pain syndromes, continues to be challenging to manage with conventional pharmacological approaches. While botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is well established for treating spasticity after stroke, its use in the management of central neuropathic pain remains less well established.

methodsThis report presents two cases of patients with refractory neuropathic pain following ischemic cerebrovascular accidents who achieved significant pain relief through subcutaneous botulinum toxin administration, after failure of multiple conventional and intramuscular BoNT-A approaches.

resultsCase 1 involves a 66-year-old patient with 18 years of post-stroke hemicorporeal pain who responded dramatically to subcutaneous BoNT-A injections after extensive prior treatment failures. Case 2 describes a 54-year-old with trigeminal-region and mandibular pain following ICA dissection who achieved complete pain resolution at facial sites with subcutaneous administration of BoNT-A.

conclusionsThese cases demonstrate the potential efficacy of subcutaneous botulinum toxin for managing post-stroke neuropathic pain in selected patients and suggest a mechanism of action related to peripheral pain sensitization rather than motor denervation. Our findings support further investigation of subcutaneous administration techniques for pain management in specialized centers.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ANeuralgiaNeuromuscular AgentsStrokeAgedFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedBotulinum Toxins, Type AincobotulinumtoxinANeuromuscular Agentsbotulinum toxincase reportcentral sensitizationneuropathic painpost-stroke painrefractory pain managementsubcutaneous injection

Identifiers

PMID42188619
PMCPMC13211558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.