ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived NK Cells as an Off-the-Shelf Platform for Cancer Immunotherapy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and Blueprints: Next-Generation Engineering Strategies for CAR-T Cell Therapy in Gastrointestinal Tumors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, off-the-shelf cellular immunotherapies have attracted much attention as a practical alternative to autologous therapies. Within this landscape, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived natural killer cells (iPSC-derived NK cells; iPSC-NK) have emerged as a highly versatile platform because they combine renewable starting material, batch-to-batch uniformity, favorable intrinsic safety, and amenability to precise genetic engineering.This review places iPSC-NK cells within the broader field of NK cell-based immunotherapy by comparing them with peripheral blood-derived NK cells, umbilical cord blood-derived NK cells, and NK cell lines, including clinically explored NK-92-based platforms, and by outlining key distinctions between NK cell therapies and CAR-T approaches. We summarize current strategies for iPSC-to-NK differentiation, spanning feeder-based systems, feeder-free protocols, embryoid body approaches, and scalable GMP-compatible manufacturing methods. We further discuss genetic engineering strategies for NK cells, with particular emphasis on genetic tuning as a systems-level framework for coordinating CAR signaling, cytokine responsiveness, and activation-inhibition balance to improve antitumor efficacy while preserving functional stability and clinical safety. In addition, this review examines translational challenges that continue to limit broader NK-cell adoption, including incomplete functional maturation, limited persistence, donor- and source-dependent variability, manufacturing standardization, cryopreservation, and quality-control requirements. Early clinical studies of iPSC-NK products indicate a favorable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity in selected hematologic malignancies, although durable efficacy and broader validation in solid tumors remain to be established. Importantly, iPSC-NK cells should be considered one of several complementary NK-cell platforms rather than a definitive or universally superior strategy. Overall, current evidence supports iPSC-NK cells as a promising programmable off-the-shelf platform, but their ultimate clinical impact will depend on achieving reproducible large-scale manufacturing, balanced genetic engineering, and consistent in vivo performance relative to other NK-cell sources and established CAR-T therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42189488What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.