SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Head Acceleration Magnitude in Sport-Related Concussive Impacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSport-related concussion (SRC) is a common and complex injury in athletic populations. Linear head acceleration (LHA) and rotational head acceleration (RHA) are key biomechanical factors believed to contribute to SRC, each through distinct mechanisms. Evaluating head impact magnitudes across different sports, athlete populations, and measurement methods is essential for advancing SRC injury prevention and risk assessment.
objectiveWe aimed to examine linear and rotational head acceleration magnitudes associated with SRC impacts in athletes participating in team sports across all ages and both sexes.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus) until 4 September, 2024, and the literature search was updated on the 10 November, 2025. Observational and experimental studies reporting peak LHA and/or RHA during SRC impacts in team sport athletes were included. Data were extracted on study characteristics, instrumentation, and head impact magnitudes. The risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compare SRC and non-concussive impacts, and subgroup analyses were performed by sport type, age group, sex, session type, and instrumentation type, reporting standardized mean difference and mean difference. Between-group differences were assessed using Q
resultsData from 30 articles representing 3262 athletes (12% female) were included. Sport-related concussion impacts produced significantly greater head acceleration magnitudes than non-concussive impacts, with large differences for both LHA (69.6 g vs 25.3 g; standardized mean difference = 2.42; 95% confidence interval 1.73-3.12) and RHA (4931 rad/s
conclusionsIn team sports, SRC impacts are associated with significantly higher LHA and RHA than non-concussive impacts. The observed overlap and contextual variability in head acceleration magnitudes highlight the importance of considering individual-specific and context-specific interpretation in SRC risk assessment and provide a foundation for improving head impact monitoring, injury prevention strategies, and athlete safety. CLINICAL
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024584070.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.