ArticleBMC public health2026
Spatial analysis of predictors of prostate cancer incidence in the united states using multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR).
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer incidence varies markedly across the United States (U.S.), yet the broad contextual predictors associated with this variation and the spatial scales at which these associations operate remain insufficiently characterized within a unified spatial framework.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine annual state-level associations between prostate cancer incidence and selected contextual predictors across the U.S. from 2018 to 2022 using Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR).
methodsFive annual state-level datasets covering the 50 U.S. states were assembled for 2018-2022. After exploratory spatial analysis, correlation screening, collinearity diagnostics, theory-informed re-evaluation, and representative-year sensitivity analyses, six predictors were retained for the final annual models: elevation, rainfall, atmospheric pressure, obesity prevalence, the percentage of males aged 65 years and older among the male population, and the percentage of the Black or African American alone population. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), and MGWR were fitted separately for each annual dataset. Model performance was compared using R², adjusted R², residual sum of squares, corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc), bandwidth diagnostics, and residual spatial autocorrelation.
resultsAcross all five annual analyses, MGWR showed the most favorable overall performance, with adjusted R² values ranging from 0.555 to 0.618 and AICc values ranging from 124.934 to 132.779. MGWR also identified variable-specific adaptive bandwidths ranging from 24 to 40 nearest neighbors, indicating spatial scale heterogeneity among predictors. Local coefficient surfaces showed clear spatial non-stationarity in both coefficient magnitude and, for some predictors, coefficient direction. Residual Moran's I tests were non-significant for all five annual models, suggesting that substantial residual spatial autocorrelation had been reduced after model fitting. Multivariate clustering of standardized local coefficients further revealed recurring regional groupings in coefficient-pattern similarity.
conclusionAt the state level in the U.S., prostate cancer incidence was associated with geographically differentiated contextual patterns rather than a single spatially uniform relationship structure. In this setting, the main value of MGWR lay in its ability to characterize multi-scale and regionally varying association patterns across repeated annual spatial analyses. These findings may support geographically differentiated surveillance and future hypothesis generation while underscoring the importance of considering spatial heterogeneity in ecological studies of prostate cancer incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.