ArticleBMC immunology2026
A conserved capsid-based multi-epitope vaccine targeting dengue virus serotypes (DENV1-4): an integrated computational and in vivo study.
Article in BMC immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDengue virus (DENV), comprising four antigenically distinct serotypes (DENV1-4), continues to pose a major global health burden. The lack of a universally protective vaccine capable of inducing balanced immunity against all serotypes remains a critical challenge, largely due to antigenic diversity and the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Conserved capsid proteins represent promising targets for epitope-based vaccine development because of their structural stability and immunogenic potential.
methodsAn integrated reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics strategy was employed to design a conserved capsid-based multi-epitope vaccine (MEV-DV) targeting DENV1-4. B-cell, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL), and helper T-lymphocyte (HTL) epitopes were screened for antigenicity, non-allergenicity, non-toxicity, and sequence conservancy. Selected epitopes were assembled using appropriate linkers with β-defensin as an adjuvant and a PADRE sequence. The construct was evaluated for physicochemical properties, 3D structure modeling and validation, solubility, disulfide engineering, molecular docking with TLR4 and TLR8, molecular dynamics simulation, and immune simulation. Experimental validation was performed in albino mice using an alum-adjuvanted formulation, and humoral responses were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay.
resultsThe finalized MEV-DV construct exhibited high antigenicity (0.8559), favorable physicochemical properties, and structural stability, with 97.6% of residues located in favored Ramachandran regions. Docking studies demonstrated strong binding affinity with TLR4 and TLR8, and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed stable receptor-vaccine interactions over 50 ns. Immune simulations predicted robust humoral and cellular immune responses with sustained memory formation. In vivo immunization induced detectable antibodies by day 7, with peak HI titers at day 21. Antibody levels were statistically comparable to those elicited by a commercial inactivated dengue vaccine (p > 0.05), and no adverse effects were observed.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that a conserved capsid-based multi-epitope vaccine designed through reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics is structurally stable, immunogenic, and safe in a murine model. The combined computational and experimental findings support the potential of MEV-DV as a promising broadly protective dengue vaccine candidate and warrant further evaluation through neutralization assays and viral challenge studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.